Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Sun May 26, 2013 3:44 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:12 pm 
Offline
Middleweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:50 pm
Posts: 905
bugoyparin wrote:
thanks for the update elmod...

until contracts is not signed... there is still some changes to come...


When the date of the match is announced and the series of press conference started, it is
certain that the fight is a done deal (contracts are signed).

Palusot ka pa kung kunyari di mo alam.

You started a KSP nonsense thread by addressing Manny as Catchweight King when in fact there is no weight issue in this 4th fight. :D

_________________
"Kung wala nang kurap, marami nang bulag."--- andoy
Haters masquerading as boxing fans or "experts" are Pactards of the Worst Kind (CRABS).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:28 am 
Offline
Lightweight

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:13 am
Posts: 154
Location: toronto
No need for a catch weight on this one. Both guys will not make 147 anyway. Marquuez ask for a catch weight the last time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:35 am 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:16 am
Posts: 449
fretmarks wrote:
First off, what's wrong with catchweight? Welterweight is officially at 141-147 pounds. 144 lbs. or any number, including, and between 141 and 147 lbs. is STILL Welterweight. If people are going to be too "technical" about this, then all weigh-ins should be done right before the fight. Just right before the fighters go inside the ring.

Second; 3 catchweight fights, even if they are title fights, do not merit Pacquiao to be branded as a catchweight king in such a bad light. Cotto and Margarito fought Pacquiao at a catchweight of 145 lbs. and 150 lbs. (151?) respectively, but they both outweighed him SIGNIFICANTLY during the fight. Margarito was 17 lbs. heavier than Pacquiao during the fight, for crying out loud! That's two divisions heavier.

Third; MP-JMM III was at a catchweight of 144 to accomodate Marquez's supposedly "lighter" weight since he is the current Lightweight champion. In the weigh-ins, Pacquiao weighed 143 and Marquez 142. The catchweight limit wasn't even reached by both. Come fight night, Marquez actually weighed more at 150 lbs. compared to Pacquiao's 148lbs.

If MP-JMM IV will be at catchweight again, it wouldn't matter. As both fighters will virtually weigh the same during the fight night.

Catchweight or not, I'm already excited about this fight.


Thumbs up! Dami kasing maarte dito, kesyo catchweight is not "the real" weight. Yung mga mahilig magreklamo tungkol sa catchweight, please send your petition to the boxing commissions to put a division on every weight and not a range of weight like 141-147 lbs. 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 147 each should have it's own division. Para wala ng masabe mga reklamador dito. And great fights like Chavez Jr. v Martinez and Ward v Dawson shouldn't happen because someone has to move up or down. Catchweight, pft.
:verymad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:40 am 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:16 am
Posts: 449
eugene24 wrote:
SINO bang nagpa-umpisa nitong catchweight???...I think this was never heard in olden era. Sinong nagpa-uso ngayon? If so, is this the way of making pacman 8 world championships diff. weight classes legitimate???..OMG..this is another controversial issue. Thatswhy the brits wont consider pacman 8 diff. weight classes champion BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY OF THESE CATCHWEIGHTSSSS.


Sino pa, eh di yung mga tangang hindi nakakaintindi ng weight range katulad ng 141-147. Somehow, there's a part on their brain that just could not understand that 141 is a Welterweight and it has to be exactly 147. And those sour losers who are making up excuses like "oh because it was a catch weight so our guy is weight drained". Look, if your guy doesn't want to get weight drained, then don't sign the freaking contract!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 2:56 am 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:16 am
Posts: 449
bugoyparin wrote:
as you know, catchweight king manny pacquiao chose his main rival juan manuel marquez on dec 8th for their fourth meetings...

will be this on a catchweight bout???


Ah, I see. Opening up a thread to mock Manny of using catchweight huh?

To answer your question, there's no need for these two to fight at a catchweight. Since there is no belt to fight for, if they want to fight at 140 that shouldn't be a problem because both can make the weight. If they want to fight at 144 so be it. The point is, no matter what weight it is, no one has to drain or gain weight to make the fight. So that argument that you're going to insinuate about Manny is "taking advantage" of his opponents using "catchweight" is obliterated by this post and any new argument based on this in the future would be idiotically stupid.

Now, let me ask you, what is the weight division of weight ranging from 141-147lbs?

If your answer is correct then "So what's the problem?"
If your answer is wrong "You're already on the net, Google it for dang sake"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:04 am 
Offline
Middleweight

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:57 pm
Posts: 768
yup TS, para masaya ka it will be catch weight ... they agreed to fight in heavyweight category and one of the alphabet boxing organizations will sanction it ... so this will be Manny's 9th weight category championship - heavy weight champion of the world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:53 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:11 pm
Posts: 4038
They can fight in any weight they want it. WTF.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:12 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 15846
Location: Paradise
Btw, this is a non-title fight .
Pac has no belt at 147.
JMM chose not to defend his belt at 140. :shock:
Did he ask Pac to come down to 140 ?

_________________
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world.
Those who know binary code and those who don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:23 am 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:49 pm
Posts: 433
Catchweight or not, Pacquiao fcked these "CHAMPIONS" up. Call him anything you want, TS, look at his resume. Plus, all these fighters that fought him at these catchweights knew what they were signing up for. they're not dumb. It was their hands that signed the contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:59 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:20 pm
Posts: 5469
acjp38 wrote:
Catchweight or not, Pacquiao fcked these "CHAMPIONS" up. Call him anything you want, TS, look at his resume. Plus, all these fighters that fought him at these catchweights knew what they were signing up for. they're not dumb. It was their hands that signed the contract.


agree!!!!!!!

8)

_________________
"If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen"

I am responsible for what i say, I am not responsible for what you understand.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:25 am 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:10 pm
Posts: 203
Location: GSM World
bugoyparin should be change to bulokparin.... :D :D :D

_________________
"Pinoy Rocks GSM World"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
Lightweight

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:05 pm
Posts: 195
Location: gotham
andycastro wrote:
brucewayne wrote:
andycastro wrote:

17 divisions are more than enough but it didn't prevent "cheaters" from fighting in lower weights
by weight cutting
. Why then should you blame those who ask for a catchweight to even up with "weight cheats"?

TS pac-hating is obvious when he blames Manny for a catchweight that is asked by Marquez and include the bout as one of Manny's catchweight fights and not one for Marquez.


Kindly explain why did you say 'cheaters' if they already make/cut the weight? if they can, they are not cheating but if they rigged something/weigh scale - that is cheating.

The traditional rules in boxing provides that a fighter should weigh not more than the limit on the day of the fight. Taking advantage of day before the fight weigh-ins, bigger fighters are able to replenish their bodies and weigh much bigger on fight night. It's legal and therefore, the quotation marks.


so there is no need to address them as 'cheaters'. as far as the 'new' rules of weighing fighters of today, if the fighter make the weight a day before the fight, they are fighting fair and square as per the rules, hence calling them cheaters is uncalled for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:49 pm 
Offline
Middleweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:50 pm
Posts: 905
brucewayne wrote:
andycastro wrote:

The traditional rules in boxing provides that a fighter should weigh not more than the limit on the day of the fight. Taking advantage of day before the fight weigh-ins, bigger fighters are able to replenish their bodies and weigh much bigger on fight night. It's legal and therefore, the quotation marks.


so there is no need to address them as 'cheaters'. as far as the 'new' rules of weighing fighters of today, if the fighter make the weight a day before the fight, they are fighting fair and square as per the rules, hence calling them cheaters is uncalled for.


What's in a name? Cheating legally is still cheating!!

Mayweather signed for a 144 lbs catchweight with Marquez but came in at 146. He 'legally' paid Marquez a specific fine which Marquez could not reject at that point and accepted just to go on with the fight. Who can say that calling Floydie 'cheated the weights' is 'uncalled for'. :D

_________________
"Kung wala nang kurap, marami nang bulag."--- andoy
Haters masquerading as boxing fans or "experts" are Pactards of the Worst Kind (CRABS).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:04 am 
Offline
Lightweight

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:05 pm
Posts: 195
Location: gotham
andycastro wrote:
brucewayne wrote:
andycastro wrote:

The traditional rules in boxing provides that a fighter should weigh not more than the limit on the day of the fight. Taking advantage of day before the fight weigh-ins, bigger fighters are able to replenish their bodies and weigh much bigger on fight night. It's legal and therefore, the quotation marks.


so there is no need to address them as 'cheaters'. as far as the 'new' rules of weighing fighters of today, if the fighter make the weight a day before the fight, they are fighting fair and square as per the rules, hence calling them cheaters is uncalled for.


What's in a name? Cheating legally is still cheating!!

Mayweather signed for a 144 lbs catchweight with Marquez but came in at 146. He 'legally' paid Marquez a specific fine which Marquez could not reject at that point and accepted just to go on with the fight. Who can say that calling Floydie 'cheated the weights' is 'uncalled for'. :D



you've just set a different example, yes pbf cheated on that one as he did not followed the agreed weight and everyone knows it, but if he managed to trim down to 144, nobody can claim he cheated but we all know he have advantaged over to jmm. rules are rules. if you do not follow, you are a cheater, if you do follow, we'll, nobody can call you a cheat even if you have a big advantage over your opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:11 am 
Offline
Middleweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:50 pm
Posts: 905
brucewayne wrote:
andycastro wrote:
andycastro wrote:

The traditional rules in boxing provides that a fighter should weigh not more than the limit on the day of the fight. Taking advantage of day before the fight weigh-ins, bigger fighters are able to replenish their bodies and weigh much bigger on fight night. It's legal and therefore, the quotation marks.

brucewayne wrote:
so there is no need to address them as 'cheaters'. as far as the 'new' rules of weighing fighters of today, if the fighter make the weight a day before the fight, they are fighting fair and square as per the rules, hence calling them cheaters is uncalled for.


What's in a name? Cheating legally is still cheating!!

Mayweather signed for a 144 lbs catchweight with Marquez but came in at 146. He 'legally' paid Marquez a specific fine which Marquez could not reject at that point and accepted just to go on with the fight. Who can say that calling Floydie 'cheated the weights' is 'uncalled for'. :D



you've just set a different example, yes pbf cheated on that one as he did not followed the agreed weight and everyone knows it, but if he managed to trim down to 144, nobody can claim he cheated but we all know he have advantaged over to jmm. rules are rules. if you do not follow, you are a cheater, if you do follow, we'll, nobody can call you a cheat even if you have a big advantage over your opponent.

Look here, Sonny. TS started this thread calling Manny Pac Catchweight King, implying Manny takes advantage of his opponents by 'draining' them through catchweights. This only shows the TS and maybe you don't understand that the need for catchweights is to deter or equalize these so called 'weight cheats'. Middleweights fighting as Welters thru catchweights should be exposed as 'weight cheats' instead of blaming those who ask for it to level the field.

Recent history is replete with examples of these 'weight cheats', Mayweather is the least of them since he did it only once, to Marquez. We have Castillo, Margarito and lately JC Chavez Jr. to name some.

Point is, I (and many others) can call these 'weight cheaters' as such rather than call Manny as Catchweight King.

_________________
"Kung wala nang kurap, marami nang bulag."--- andoy
Haters masquerading as boxing fans or "experts" are Pactards of the Worst Kind (CRABS).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: oneshot and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group