Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:27 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:00 am 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 8:16 pm
Posts: 3161
Location: Quezon City
LAS VEGAS – Manny Pacquiao has the numbers to prove that he had the better end of his third fight with Juan Manuel Marquez.

And numbers don’t lie.

Based on the final punchstats provided by Compubox, Pacquiao threw and landed more punches after 12 rounds of action at the MGM Grand Saturday.

Pacquiao, the stats sheet said, threw a total of 578 punches and connected 176 times for 30 percent accuracy. Marquez unleashed 436 punches and landed less, 138.

In the jabs department, Pacquiao landed 59 of 304 while Marquez landed only 38 of 182 jabs. In the power punches, again it was Pacquiao who threw more and landed more.

Pacquiao threw 274 power punches and found the mark 117 times, and Marquez threw 254 of them, and connected a hundred times.


READ MORE:

http://www.philstar.com/SportsArticle.a ... egoryId=69


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:41 am 
Offline
Middleweight

Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:49 am
Posts: 634
Location: US
Ok there, that should silence the critics and oh those two judges has eagle eyes, no wonder they're judges and not spectators. Plus on top of that Manny is the aggressor and he controlled the ring. If you're the Challenger you need to impress the judges and prove that you WANT the belt, backtracking and waiting for your opponent to punch doesn't do it for the judges. Sorry Juan not this time around, again!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:13 pm 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 8:16 pm
Posts: 3161
Location: Quezon City
Pinoy62 wrote:
Ok there, that should silence the critics and oh those two judges has eagle eyes, no wonder they're judges and not spectators. Plus on top of that Manny is the aggressor and he controlled the ring. If you're the Challenger you need to impress the judges and prove that you WANT the belt, backtracking and waiting for your opponent to punch doesn't do it for the judges. Sorry Juan not this time around, again!



I AGREE., AND ALSO THINK THAT JMM SHOULD'VE GONE FOR "BROKE" IN THE 12TH RD KNOWING WHAT HAPPENED IN THE 1ST 2 FIGHTS.. HE ACTUALLY SAYS THIS TIME "HE WON'T LET THE JUDGES" SCORE THE FIGHT, BUT HE DIDN'T EVEN TRY TO KO MANNY IN THE 12TH! HIS "FAULT" AS WELL AND HE SHOULD LIVE THE REST OF HIS LIFE SOURGRAPING, TOGETHER W/ HIS FANS AND "FAKE" PAC FANS WHO ONLY ROOTS FOR MANNY WHEN MANNY WAS WINNING BY A WIDE MARGIN.. I WILL STAY SA A "PAC" FAN NO MATTER WHAT.. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE OTHERS THOUGH' (YUNG MGA NAKILALA LANG SI PAC AFTER THE DIAZ FIGHT), JUST SHUT-UP@ YOU'RE ALL JUST PRETENDERS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 9:21 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:33 pm
Posts: 10177
compubox numbers..

pacquiao is the clear...

_________________
the problem with the world is, intelligent people are full of doubts, while stupid people are full of confidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 9:33 pm 
Offline
Featherweight

Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:16 pm
Posts: 63
hightimes wrote:
compubox numbers..

pacquiao is the clear...


The goalposts had been moved, Compubox is not reliable now. Replays are more accurate.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group