Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:38 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 pm 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 2253
Location: Ringside
For me, two is enough

It's a 2-0 win already for pac,

That's why?
:?
U knew what i mean :wink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qZ8ciiJ ... ata_player


Last edited by Navy Blue on Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:07 pm 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 3391
Location: Somewhere in Pacific Island!
Who the heck is Brsdley? :?







:biglaugh:

_________________
Quote:
SOMEBODY!! KILL ME!!

DREAM!! BELIEVE!! AND!! MULTIPLY!! OH YEAH!! XD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:12 pm 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 2253
Location: Ringside
concon wrote:
Who the heck is Brsdley? :?







:biglaugh:


Oooops sorry!

tao lang typo err.

im using my selfon while

clicking my post :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:18 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:58 am
Posts: 8439
Navy Blue wrote:
For me, two is enough

It's a 2-0 win already for pac,

That's why?
:?
U knew what i mean :wink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qZ8ciiJ ... ata_player

no need. manny virtually beats him in the first fight and convincingly won on the last fight. only marquez and duckweather are left as the logical fights for our hero before the curtain calls.

_________________
Filipinos are World Class..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:34 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 4777
Location: City of angels
Navy Blue wrote:
For me, two is enough

It's a 2-0 win already for pac,

That's why?
:?
U knew what i mean :wink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qZ8ciiJ ... ata_player



I'd rather Pac fight JMM than a trilogy with Bradley,duh!!!he beat him twice already..

_________________
Remember it was the Media ..that destroy Erap and the brought the negative perception of this present Government..
this Media was a tools by the Marcoses to brainwash the people during his Regime-Dan44


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:02 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:27 pm
Posts: 5335
Location: Where the Philippine Eagle roams free
This thread reminds me of the events leading to Pac-Marquez III. Many fans then were adamant in their opposition to the holding of Pacquiao-Marquez III owing to the fact that they believed Pacquiao was already 2-0 against Marquez as one judge in the first fight had already admitted having bungled the scoring in the first round. The fans also took offense at what they perceived as a personal insult committed by Marquez by coming to the Philippines and personally challenged Pacquiao to a third fight. But here we are discussing a possible Pacquiao-Marquez V. This goes to show that Arum is an excellent if not a genius match-maker. He can easily make an otherwise unappealing matchup compelling with some publicity maneuvers. I believe Pac-Bradley III is in the offing. Arum is just waiting for the right moment to stage it, just as he forego the holding of Pac-Bradley II right after the controversial first fight.

_________________
The very powerful & the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views... Dr. Who


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:39 am 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:15 am
Posts: 227
Location: Daly City, California
A BIG NO!!! Same result. Bradley will hurt his legs again from bobbin and weavin and ducking and running to avoid being hit! If its basketball, Bradley hurt his leg twice from Pacquaios cross-over! Lol!

_________________
" Dream BIG with your eyes wide open.."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:48 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 22344
Location: Paradise
Does he deserve a RUBBER match ?
NO.
This fight was a flop. It did not sell well. Out of the 15,000 in the arena, at least 3K got their tickets for free.
The PPV number is not going to be pretty. It'll be less than a million for sure. Maybe even below 700K.

Bradley can't beat Pac . Pac has his number.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:50 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 22344
Location: Paradise
ARKAN wrote:
This thread reminds me of the events leading to Pac-Marquez III. Many fans then were adamant in their opposition to the holding of Pacquiao-Marquez III owing to the fact that they believed Pacquiao was already 2-0 against Marquez as one judge in the first fight had already admitted having bungled the scoring in the first round. The fans also took offense at what they perceived as a personal insult committed by Marquez by coming to the Philippines and personally challenged Pacquiao to a third fight. But here we are discussing a possible Pacquiao-Marquez V. This goes to show that Arum is an excellent if not a genius match-maker. He can easily make an otherwise unappealing matchup compelling with some publicity maneuvers. I believe Pac-Bradley III is in the offing. Arum is just waiting for the right moment to stage it, just as he forego the holding of Pac-Bradley II right after the controversial first fight.

How many rounds has Bradley won in the two fights ?
8 rounds total imo.
The first fight was not even as close as the rematch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:59 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:27 pm
Posts: 5335
Location: Where the Philippine Eagle roams free
JoeyInCali wrote:
ARKAN wrote:
This thread reminds me of the events leading to Pac-Marquez III. Many fans then were adamant in their opposition to the holding of Pacquiao-Marquez III owing to the fact that they believed Pacquiao was already 2-0 against Marquez as one judge in the first fight had already admitted having bungled the scoring in the first round. The fans also took offense at what they perceived as a personal insult committed by Marquez by coming to the Philippines and personally challenged Pacquiao to a third fight. But here we are discussing a possible Pacquiao-Marquez V. This goes to show that Arum is an excellent if not a genius match-maker. He can easily make an otherwise unappealing matchup compelling with some publicity maneuvers. I believe Pac-Bradley III is in the offing. Arum is just waiting for the right moment to stage it, just as he forego the holding of Pac-Bradley II right after the controversial first fight.

How many rounds has Bradley won in the two fights ?
8 rounds total imo.
The first fight was not even as close as the rematch.


Honestly, I didn't finish watching the first fight and I didn't even bother to catch the replay. I could sense that something wasn't right. I don't know if it's only me experiencing this or maybe I had a drink too many but I felt that the Top Rank fight anchor/s were trying to condition the people's mind for a Bradley victory. Pac had the fight in control but the anchors made it appear that Pacquiao was losing.

_________________
The very powerful & the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views... Dr. Who


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group