1. wrong its 4 times. but then can it guarantee that pac will dropped marquez again?---> You cant guarantee but it's very probable for JMM to kiss the canvass permanently
it very irrelevant now because in the 3rd fight pac never dropped marquez. FAIL --->>> It's irrelevant for you, but what happened in the past can still happen in the future..unless you are NostraDAMNus reincarnated and saw what's in the future. You're discounting the other fights coz Pac never dropped JMM in the 3rd fight? That's totally idiotic and irrelevant, the possibility and probability is still high
2. wrong again, pac won just 2 fights Now you're talking
. those 3 fights are highly debatable and can go either way ---> Ha?? I thought you're based on FACTS and not OPINION, make up your mind. Perhaps you're just confuse, get a dictionary
. can we use this again to gauge the upcoming 4th fight? a big NO. ---> A BIG YES coz that's a fact and it happened before and may happen again.
3. as if he was drooped being the agressor. he never became an agressor in the 1st place ---> That's why he never won a single fight, this is boxing not a dancing game and don't tell me that JMM connected more punches. Go to compubox and compare
. a bitter taste of canvass? ---> Yep! and it is still fresh in the mind of JMM, ask him how it tastes
. pac must be thankful those had occured. ---> Thankful?? You think it's luck? It was destiny for JMM to kiss canvass 4 times!
if not, he wont achieve what he is now. ----> Epic fail! you sound bitter and more of a crab with this one!
also, check my reply in no 1 again. --->> No need coz it's pointless, check my reply for #1
4. marquez can talk crap as he wants, but then he has all the right to do that because his fights against pac were all debatable.--->> Again not a very factual response. You're loosing it brother, hang-in there. Bragging rights belong to Manny, he won all the fights, dropped your loudmouth-crybaby JMM 4 times and it's written in history ---facts backed-up with figures
now question, did the facts you presented were all relevant ones? go figure out. ---> it's very understandable no need for second thoughts.
and besides, i never argue on the definition of fact as based on past exp i just stated that not all facts can be relevant.---> Well then, you should have not used the word FACT in the first place instead more of your opinion.
don't let your BP rise. You're just jumping to a nonsense conclusion---> What's the title of your thread? who's jumping into conclusion now