Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 10:25 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:43 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 6096
My favorite recent look-the-other-way example: Juan Manuel Marquez couldn't knock down Manny Pacquiao for 36 solid rounds over three of their fights. Before their third fight, the 39-year-old Marquez aligned himself with a disgraced strength-and-conditioning coach named Angel Heredia (Google his name and PEDs; it's a fun 10 minutes), arrived in Vegas so ripped that he weighed in four pounds under the 147-pound limit, knocked Pacquiao down early with a vicious power punch, then coldcocked him a few rounds later with one of the single greatest knockout punches ever thrown. What did we do? We bought the fight, gathered in our living rooms. We oohed and aahed, tweeted our disbelief and forwarded the YouTube clip around. And when Marquez passed the bogus post-fight drug test — for the record, Keith Richards in 1978 after a night at Studio 54 could pass one of boxing's drug tests — everyone let the moment go.

Know this: Every boxing fan I know believes that Marquez enhanced his chances that night.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/890 ... d-question

---

he makes good points here. i'm starting to see the light :)

_________________
http://www.kingsofchaos.com/recruit.php?uniqid=cjp598mh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:47 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 4:58 am
Posts: 5757
I'm not sour graping....ok, yeah I am but the truth is JMM was no more cleaner than Lance Armstrong. With Angel Heredia in his camp, was there ever any doubt? There's the drug test and then there's the visual test. Even Stevie Wonder saw the difference at the weigh-in. I think all sound and reasonable boxing fans can see that something was up.

_________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:51 am 
Offline
Light Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:08 am
Posts: 1479
I think Chael Sonnen got it right when he said "did he take something? Absolutely. Did he take something that was illegal? According to the test he did not."

_________________
"I promise violence" - Wanderlei Silva


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:56 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 15834
Location: Paradise
Unfortunately we all said NSAC test is enough when Floidy
asked for osdt. Roach said it too.

_________________
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world.
Those who know binary code and those who don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:14 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:11 pm
Posts: 4034
Just test them both before their 5th fight and lets see what happens.... if no one is sure without unjust advantage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:33 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:07 pm
Posts: 6235
heredia's PEDs will never be detected through lab tests unless one whistle blower would come out to spill the beans, just like in armstrong's case. all these lab tests nowadays are useless they should have legalized the use of PEDs to even up the playing fields. there's one problem though: the negative after-effect of the peds on boxer's health.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 7:55 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 15834
Location: Paradise
dominic wrote:
heredia's PEDs will never be detected through lab tests unless one whistle blower would come out to spill the beans, just like in armstrong's case. all these lab tests nowadays are useless they should have legalized the use of PEDs to even up the playing fields. there's one problem though: the negative after-effect of the peds on boxer's health.

That's like saying legalize cocaine use .
PED are illegal drugs by law ( for human use ) even though stuff like IGF-1 are used on animals and fish to make them bigger.

_________________
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world.
Those who know binary code and those who don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:02 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 6096
the improvement in power is too significant to be brushed aside. pac could still have won this if he were more careful but he was fighting a really good fight at that point. but that power of marquez, crazy and so unlike him.

_________________
http://www.kingsofchaos.com/recruit.php?uniqid=cjp598mh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:02 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 4:58 am
Posts: 5757
dominic wrote:
heredia's PEDs will never be detected through lab tests unless one whistle blower would come out to spill the beans, just like in armstrong's case. all these lab tests nowadays are useless they should have legalized the use of PEDs to even up the playing fields. there's one problem though: the negative after-effect of the peds on boxer's health.


yup. i absolutely agree. unfortunately, sports has gotten so dirty that the only way to make it fair is to legalize PEDs. athletes already know the downside of PEDs. apparently, a lot are willing to take the risk to play at the elite level.

_________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
Light Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:52 pm
Posts: 1907
Location: Andromeda Galaxy
jmm didnt became stronger, the facts is Pacman was hit squarely to the temple on 3rd rnd,, and ran straight to JMMs right hand on the 6th. enough of those accusations...Hard evidence is needed to supplement ur accusations.

_________________
LMAO, MPAO,SPAO,SIOPAO ...

CATCHY IT AINT ???

Our universe is one of the Billion universes out there.......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:18 pm 
Offline
Middleweight

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:19 am
Posts: 798
chiktoferken wrote:
jmm didnt became stronger, the facts is Pacman was hit squarely to the temple on 3rd rnd,, and ran straight to JMMs right hand on the 6th. enough of those accusations...Hard evidence is needed to supplement ur accusations.

Pac absorbed so many power punch from JMM starting from their first fight but their last fight is unbelievable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 15834
Location: Paradise
chiktoferken wrote:
jmm didnt BECOME stronger, the facts is Pacman was hit squarely to the temple on 3rd rnd,, and ran straight to JMMs right hand on the 6th. enough of those accusations...Hard evidence is needed to supplement ur accusations.

Yes, he did.
The 3rd round knockdown showed it.

_________________
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world.
Those who know binary code and those who don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:06 pm 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:55 am
Posts: 492
Location: inside the pipe
ingon ang bungi..maos maos lang ta bay

_________________
Give God what's right -- not what's left


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:27 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:47 pm
Posts: 14409
studstar wrote:
My favorite recent look-the-other-way example: Juan Manuel Marquez couldn't knock down Manny Pacquiao for 36 solid rounds over three of their fights. Before their third fight, the 39-year-old Marquez aligned himself with a disgraced strength-and-conditioning coach named Angel Heredia (Google his name and PEDs; it's a fun 10 minutes), arrived in Vegas so ripped that he weighed in four pounds under the 147-pound limit, knocked Pacquiao down early with a vicious power punch, then coldcocked him a few rounds later with one of the single greatest knockout punches ever thrown. What did we do? We bought the fight, gathered in our living rooms. We oohed and aahed, tweeted our disbelief and forwarded the YouTube clip around. And when Marquez passed the bogus post-fight drug test — for the record, Keith Richards in 1978 after a night at Studio 54 could pass one of boxing's drug tests — everyone let the moment go.

Know this: Every boxing fan I know believes that Marquez enhanced his chances that night.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/890 ... d-question

---

he makes good points here. i'm starting to see the light :)



i think it had to do more on the "strength conditioning" of Marquez that did Pacquiao in. if only Pacquiao did not push the issue in the last 5 seconds, the turn out would have been different, and the loser Marquez will not be questioned about his trainer's shady past.

if ever Marquez did take PEDs, he got a good excuse not to be checked thoroughly for it, because of Pacquiao camp's refusal to implement stricter rules used by USDA(?).

all things considered, PEDs or not, it was clear Pacquiao was on his way to winning that fight, until the punch seen around the world but the one he didn't see, landed smack on his face.

_________________
"I will make you an offer you can't refuse." - Michael Corleone


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:00 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 10:37 am
Posts: 5823
Location: Barrio
Don't refuse to see the obvious.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group