Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:31 am

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50404 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3302, 3303, 3304, 3305, 3306, 3307, 3308 ... 3361  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:23 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6172
PeluBoy wrote:
page 3298 yung bagong kabobohan :shock:

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=238854&start=49455#p6679747

6 pages later fishing fishing pa din wahahahaha kawawa talaga :bounce1:


Diversion na naman, ad hominem pa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
ano ang diversion, yung kabobohan mo ang topic hindi ba wahahahaha :lol:


Emmanuel53 wrote:
PeluBoy wrote:
e bakit nga ba sinuspend, bakit umabot sa ganyan ang alliance ng RP at US?


research research daw ha? pwe!


hihihihih 2011 pa ito bobo! :lol: :lol: :lol:
para sa bobong demanding na poser hihihihih wrote:
It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.


O di lalong dated yong rebuttal mo, bonehead. Ipinagmalaki pa ng 2011 yong date ng source niya, e the WPS ruling was handed down in July 2016 ,and the order to suspend the joint patrols was made in Oct. 2016
PeluBoy wrote:
wahahahahahaha ang tanga tanga talaga :biglaugh:

what did the US do, with their stance that you cited na poser ka? pinagmamalaki mo pa yung "official stand" ng US not to meddle with localized territorial disputes ha hihihihih gullible ka pag dating sa US, pero sa current admin very discriminating :lol:


what was the point of my post? nakuha mo ba? I won't explain since you're posturing to be an "intellectual" na hindi naman kasi poser lang nga, so I'll let you talk yourself into further embarassment hihihihihih :lol:

Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:27 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6172
Quote:
wahahahahahaha ang tanga tanga talaga :biglaugh:

what did the US do, with their stance that you cited na poser ka? pinagmamalaki mo pa yung "official stand" ng US not to meddle with localized territorial disputes ha hihihihih gullible ka pag dating sa US, pero sa current admin very discriminating :lol:


O iquote kita ha, - when the US made their stance that was before the WPS ruling , - the more relevant issue is what did we do with our stance after the WPS ruling came out? O gets mo na.

Now after we make our stance very clear after the WPS ruling came out, that is the time we should be asking about the US stance , hindi ba


Last edited by Emmanuel53 on Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
wahahahaha kawawa nagmamakaawa na talaga :lol:




:bounce1:

hindi alam kung bakit siya bobo hihihihih :lol:







--------
BONUS


"Here comes the trolls" hihihihih

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:32 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6172
PeluBoy wrote:
wahahahaha kawawa nagmamakaawa na talaga :lol:




:bounce1:

hindi alam kung bakit siya bobo hihihihih :lol:







--------
BONUS


"Here comes the trolls" hihihihih


Diversion ulit, i repost ko uit ha
Quote:
Emmanuel53
O iquote kita ha, - when the US made their stance that was before the WPS ruling , - the more relevant issue is what did we do with our stance after the WPS ruling came out? O gets mo na.

Now after we make our stance very clear after the WPS ruling came out, that is the time we should be asking about the US stance , hindi ba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:36 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
hihihihih kitang kita naman talaga, this bozo wants to be the "official chooser" of issues, picks his spots, answers only when he wants to....at siya pa ang me ganang magsabi ng "diversion" :shock:




nagmamakaawa na, na ituro sa bobong isip niya ang kabobohan niya wahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:


eto ulit, maybe it will illuminate your mind ak ak ak :biglaugh:

Emmanuel53 wrote:
PeluBoy wrote:
e bakit nga ba sinuspend, bakit umabot sa ganyan ang alliance ng RP at US?


research research daw ha? pwe!


hihihihih 2011 pa ito bobo! :lol: :lol: :lol:
para sa bobong demanding na poser hihihihih wrote:
It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.


O di lalong dated yong rebuttal mo, bonehead. Ipinagmalaki pa ng 2011 yong date ng source niya, e the WPS ruling was handed down in July 2016 ,and the order to suspend the joint patrols was made in Oct. 2016
PeluBoy wrote:
wahahahahahaha ang tanga tanga talaga :biglaugh:

what did the US do, with their stance that you cited na poser ka? pinagmamalaki mo pa yung "official stand" ng US not to meddle with localized territorial disputes ha hihihihih gullible ka pag dating sa US, pero sa current admin very discriminating :lol:


what was the point of my post? nakuha mo ba? I won't explain since you're posturing to be an "intellectual" na hindi naman kasi poser lang nga, so I'll let you talk yourself into further embarassment hihihihihih :lol:

Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:40 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
bwahahahaha nadale na naman ng "Here comes the trolls" :bounce1:

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:41 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
ansarap talaga magPacLand woohooo wahahahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:45 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
Lord Pelu wrote:
I won't explain since you're posturing to be an "intellectual" na hindi naman kasi poser lang nga, so I'll let you talk yourself into further embarassment hihihihihih :lol:


sakses!!! 7 pages na hihihihihih :lol: :bounce1:

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 3:00 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 5221
Location: Piero Pelù
Image

Image



:bounce1:

wahahahahaha mga kawawa talaga
:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Litfiba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 6:05 pm 
Offline
Middleweight

Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:57 pm
Posts: 832
Aysus, si pedoboy talaga o, pilit na pinapaniwala yon sarili nyang me laman ang kanyang ulo lols :lol:
Untog mo sa pader ulo mo, panigurado tunog arinola yan he he :mrgreen:

Nilampaso ng todo! Masaya pa ang ogag na dds :biglaugh:

Bwaaaaahahaha

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 7:18 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:10 pm
Posts: 18625
Location: Cbo.LP.HK
Wag ka na ngang sumabad diyan Mr. Nana, kamaganak ni Nanie at .... :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Here’s to a long life and a merry one, A quick death and an easy one, A pretty girl and a true one, A cold beer and another one." - Lewis Henry


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 7:43 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:22 am
Posts: 18036
Image





:lol: :lol:

_________________
"at least 2 years pa lang kaming nauuto ng tatay digong namin"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:19 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:02 pm
Posts: 9682
ICB, exactong pasok ni nano

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
------------------ BNSP lurker ----------------


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:37 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:22 am
Posts: 18036
Image


pampa uha lang....




:biglaugh: :biglaugh:

_________________
"at least 2 years pa lang kaming nauuto ng tatay digong namin"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50404 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3302, 3303, 3304, 3305, 3306, 3307, 3308 ... 3361  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group