Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2019 11:22 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52992 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3294, 3295, 3296, 3297, 3298, 3299, 3300 ... 3533  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:48 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:22 am
Posts: 18275
as usual lampaso lang agad iyong mga walang sustansyang argumento. :biglaugh: :biglaugh:

_________________
"at least 2 years pa lang kaming nauuto ng tatay digong namin"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:49 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6369
PeluBoy wrote:
para sa mga nangde-dedma hihihihihih :lol:

Q1
demanding na poser wrote:
PeluBoy wrote:
wahahaha I see you missed the logic there :lol:

Who the hell cares what drama the Cojuangcos and Cory's nuclear family had going on? They can engage in in-breeding for all I care (actually, from the looks of some of them, er... :lol: ), it does not change the fact that Santa Cory prevented her "precioouusss" Hacienda from being subjected to agrarian reform when she had the unitary power to do so. Didn't you at the very least know this fact? :shock:


I am ambivalent on the matter - but the fact remains that the SC ruled on this during the time of Pnoy http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nat ... ers/story/

demanding na poser wrote:
Dedmang dedma lang ako dito obvious ba hihihi :lol: ano pa ba maisasagot ko e pinagmalaki ko pa yung SC decision sa Hacienda Luisita nung term ni idol Panot, tanga kasi ako hindi ko alam kung bakit na-impeach si CJ Corona hihihihih :lol:


Q2
PeluBoy wrote:
nagmamagaling yung poser tungkol sa pledge ng China, demanding talaga ang pulpol :lol: ano naman kaya ang iiiyak mo kung napautang na ang gobyerno ng malaking percent ng pledges ng China? Magiging heavily indebted tayo na baka ma-compromise ang political independence at foreign policy? Mark these words iyan ang mababasa mo sa mga Google searches mo if and when China delivers on its pledges :lol: So ano ang gusto mo mangyari ngayon, awayin ang China? Singilin ang sinabi nilang ipapautang? Wahahaha ano gusto mo gayahin ka ng Pilipinas, demanding e mangungutang lang :lol: ikaw demanding ka pa e poser ka lang naman hihihihih

just to check your credibility, nag-ingay ka naman ba nung wala man lang solid, deterrent military response na ginawa ang US nung nag umpisang mang-usurp ang China sa WPS na yan? Alam mo ba ang official stand nila habang nangyayari yan, when we were desperate for military help from our “ally” the United States? Yung China na financial pledge, you’re quick to make a ruckus about their seeming nonfulfillment, and yet hindi pa naman halfway through ang term ni Duterte so still possible China will make good on a reasonable portion of their pledge....while the US being our ally, left us twisting in the wind at precisely the exact moment we needed their military might….hmmm financial pledge vs military response from an "ally", night and day ang contrast....kung nag iingay kang hinayupak ka ngayon tungkol sa financial pledge, aba e yung ally na hindi tumugon with a deterrent military response, even a symbolic one, should have merited more than pag-iingay sa yo, tama ba?

Let us see if you really call it as you see it or, if you are merely selective in which issues to criticize or make noise about…….in other words namumuntos lang

demanding na poser wrote:
after endless hours of Googling hindi ko pa din ma-gets ang isasagot ko hihihihih kaya, assert our WPS rights at demand the pledged financial assistance, ayos ba ang pagkakakontra ng stance na pinost ko, hindi naman siguro yan mahahalata ng China :lol: yung iba pang issues na ni-raise ng nakakaimbyernang PeluB na yan sa Q2, as usual no pansin ulit, I hope may "long and winding" ulit na post si himuderong huklubang poser at iba pang "fans" ni Pelu para mapagtakpan hihihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


Q3
PeluBoy wrote:
me nalalaman pa tong “And for this pittance - we have practically ceded our rights to the WPS” :shock: biling bili mo ang storyline na ginawa ng mga me vested interests diyan sa WPS and not merely by coincidence had more to gain had Roxas won the 2016 polls….alam mo ba yan? Dalawa lang ang possibility, alam mo nga and you just chose to ignore it in your dumb post, or worse, bobo ka talagang bozo ka
demanding na poser wrote:
Google Google Google pero wala pa din tsk hihihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


Q4
PeluBoy wrote:
what happens daw if the sh!t hits the fan? bakit, diyan ba sa pag ngawa-ngawa mo mag-iimprove ang inflation? :shock: …………nag-iilusyon ka ba na sa pag-cite mo ng articles, kesyo ang current account deficit is this and that, it will make a difference in the economy, na ikaw ang magsasalba ng kung ano man ang pinapangarap mong salbahin? ano ba yang ginagawa mo sa tingin mo? na isa kang armchair economist ? bwesit na to talagang poser na poser lang wahahahahaa :lol:

demanding na poser wrote:
pangarap ko kasing maging wheelchair economist :biglaugh: poser nga kasi ako diba, na nag-iilusyon me nakikinig sakin na mga tutoong economists at binabasa ang mga pinost kong economic articles haaay hirap na hirap ako sa pag-intindi at pagpost niyan tsk, baka kasi hindi pa nila alam yan maski tutoong economista sila e mabuti na i-remind sila hihihihih yung mga hindi ko kapanalig mga lapdogs lang kayo kasi dapat wag kayo sumuporta sa admin ni Katay Digong dahil basta, look at the articles di ba hihih solid Santa Cory at Panot lang woohoo! yung hindi matangay wala kayo mga blind fanatics lang kayo hihihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


BONUS
demanding na poser wrote:
Here comes the trolls.



huklubang poser wrote:
capitalize capitalize Beatles Beatles kailangan kong ipagtanggol si idol huhuhuhu aylabyu man!



:lol: :lol: :lol:


Ups palusot pa, the US stand was already qualified, and I did the math for China's pledge - less than 1% after more than 2 years, but I guess you are clueless when it comes to mathematical progression


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:52 am 
Emmanuel53 wrote:
PeluBoy wrote:
sinagot ko na yan a, gusto mo i-up ko ulit :lol:....... cinompute mo ba ang pinapacompute ko sa yong poser ka? :shock:


Tsk tsk do the math yourself, otherwise the issue is moot and academic when it comes to the WPS which is a matter of national security and the economy

ayun, halatang halata ang pag-sidestep mo sa mga kabobohan mo :shock: so, WPS, economy, ...any issue so you can skirt around your stupidity hihihihihih ......sinagot ko na ang kabobohan mo pa din tungkol sa economy at WPS....pero yung lahat ng mga kabobohan mo, akala mo ba mabubura mo at matatabunan mo ng posts..........sori hindi na po mabubura hihihihihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:53 am 
wahahahaha meron talaga cheerer :lol:

kailangan kasi, pareho lang bobo, cheerer at poser wahahahahaha


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:54 am 
naks, mathematical progression daw o :shock:


hindi ka nga makacompute e wahahahaha.......na-imagine mo ba yung pinacompute ko sa yo?

windang windang hihihih :lol:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:56 am 
hihihih wala na talaga to, mabagal :lol:


anong qualified pinagsasabi mo? uto uto ka talaga hihihihih kapal pa mag-akusa kung sino daw uto-uto, e pagdating sa US sino ba ang uto uto hellooooo :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6369
dan44 wrote:
Image











Sarah Duterte just exhibited her ignorance on how the EDSA revolution became a blueprint for others that followed suit. She should review her history.

In 1989 in China, protesters’ never-ending efforts to initiate democracy have their Tiananmen Square in Beijing where student-led protests were attacked and overpowered by Chinese troops who killed hundreds. In Romania, the revolution that overthrew a communist regime, also in 1989, led to a tragic sight: the dead bodies of dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife Elena, who were both executed.
Again in 1989, nonviolent versions were the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia that led to the collapse of the communist regime. The events in Czechoslovakia were triggered by the fall of the Berlin Wall that formerly divided East and West Germany where millions of people demanding political change assembled and clambered onto the walls.
Images of German youth dancing and hugging each other atop the walls to celebrate their freedom, and later of people picking up pieces of the torn wall as keepsakes added to the most powerful illustrations of the world changing during that decade.
Succeeding revolutions continued to mount in Poland, Iran, Tunisia, Egypt, the Baltic states, Latin American countries such as Chile, South Africa, and the Philippines’ neighbors Taiwan and South Korea until the 1990s and 2000s.


Duterte supporters are really clueless when it comes to lessons in history. https://www.pacificislandtimes.com/sing ... -the-world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:58 am 
up lang para sa tatanga tangang bobo, yung demanding na poser diyan hihihihih :lol:

PeluBoy wrote:
Emmanuel53 wrote:
PeluBoy wrote:
hihihihih Tita Nanie, paglampasuhin mo na si.... :?





hindi nga pala kasali wahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:


As usual wala na sa hulog ang mga response, tinanong mo ang US stand sa WPS , sinagot ng maayos, walang rebuttal, pilit idinidivert ang issue sa Hacienda Luisita which is not relevant to the present economy, or the WPS situation which are the most pressing issues at present

Tsk tsk , total eclipse of the mind

namimili talaga ng kino-quote wahahahaha bugok talaga :lol: :lol: :lol:
PeluBoy wrote:
Q2
PeluBoy wrote:
nagmamagaling yung poser tungkol sa pledge ng China, demanding talaga ang pulpol :lol: ano naman kaya ang iiiyak mo kung napautang na ang gobyerno ng malaking percent ng pledges ng China? Magiging heavily indebted tayo na baka ma-compromise ang political independence at foreign policy? Mark these words iyan ang mababasa mo sa mga Google searches mo if and when China delivers on its pledges :lol: So ano ang gusto mo mangyari ngayon, awayin ang China? Singilin ang sinabi nilang ipapautang? Wahahaha ano gusto mo gayahin ka ng Pilipinas, demanding e mangungutang lang :lol: ikaw demanding ka pa e poser ka lang naman hihihihih

just to check your credibility, nag-ingay ka naman ba nung wala man lang solid, deterrent military response na ginawa ang US nung nag umpisang mang-usurp ang China sa WPS na yan? Alam mo ba ang official stand nila habang nangyayari yan, when we were desperate for military help from our “ally” the United States? Yung China na financial pledge, you’re quick to make a ruckus about their seeming nonfulfillment, and yet hindi pa naman halfway through ang term ni Duterte so still possible China will make good on a reasonable portion of their pledge....while the US being our ally, left us twisting in the wind at precisely the exact moment we needed their military might….hmmm financial pledge vs military response from an "ally", night and day ang contrast....kung nag iingay kang hinayupak ka ngayon tungkol sa financial pledge, aba e yung ally na hindi tumugon with a deterrent military response, even a symbolic one, should have merited more than pag-iingay sa yo, tama ba?

Let us see if you really call it as you see it or, if you are merely selective in which issues to criticize or make noise about…….in other words namumuntos lang

demanding na poser wrote:
after endless hours of Googling hindi ko pa din ma-gets ang isasagot ko hihihihih kaya, assert our WPS rights at demand the pledged financial assistance, ayos ba ang pagkakakontra ng stance na pinost ko, hindi naman siguro yan mahahalata ng China :lol: yung iba pang issues na ni-raise ng nakakaimbyernang PeluB na yan sa Q2, as usual no pansin ulit, I hope may "long and winding" ulit na post si himuderong huklubang poser at iba pang "fans" ni Pelu para mapagtakpan hihihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


apologist na ng US ngayon yun demanding na poser :shock: hihihihih pinagmamalaki pa ng ungas ang vacillation ng US wahahahaha bobo talaga

o eto basahin mong bobo ka baka maintindihan mo, but I doubt it hihihih

para sa bobong demanding na poser hihihihih wrote:
It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.





yung question about your credibility, bakit dedma ka pa din hanggang ngayon? nagu-google ka pa din ba at wala pa din mahanap to save your face and ego? :shock:



sino ka ba para magdictate na ang schedule mo ang masusunod, ang issues na handpicked mo lang ang "dapat" discuss? at kung kelan mo gusto sagutin saka mo sasagutin?


demanding na poser ka talaga ha hindi yan pasado bistado ka na kaya harapin mo ang kahihiyan mo hihihihihih :lol:



and so........



:celebrate:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:58 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6369
PeluBoy wrote:
hihihih wala na talaga to, mabagal :lol:


anong qualified pinagsasabi mo? uto uto ka talaga hihihihih kapal pa mag-akusa kung sino daw uto-uto, e pagdating sa US sino ba ang uto uto hellooooo :lol: :lol: :lol:


Sino ang lumabas na uto uto - ipinagmalaki ni Duterte yong pledges ng China, tapos after two years wala pang 1% ang natupad, this was further aggravated by the fact that it was during his watch when most of the infrastructure was built on those disputed areas.

Nauto ng pledges


Last edited by Emmanuel53 on Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:02 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:00 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6369
PeluBoy wrote:
up lang para sa tatanga tangang bobo, yung demanding na poser diyan hihihihih :lol:

PeluBoy wrote:
[
PeluBoy wrote:
hihihihih Tita Nanie, paglampasuhin mo na si.... :?





hindi nga pala kasali wahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:


As usual wala na sa hulog ang mga response, tinanong mo ang US stand sa WPS , sinagot ng maayos, walang rebuttal, pilit idinidivert ang issue sa Hacienda Luisita which is not relevant to the present economy, or the WPS situation which are the most pressing issues at present

Tsk tsk , total eclipse of the mind

namimili talaga ng kino-quote wahahahaha bugok talaga :lol: :lol: :lol:
PeluBoy wrote:
Q2
PeluBoy wrote:
nagmamagaling yung poser tungkol sa pledge ng China, demanding talaga ang pulpol :lol: ano naman kaya ang iiiyak mo kung napautang na ang gobyerno ng malaking percent ng pledges ng China? Magiging heavily indebted tayo na baka ma-compromise ang political independence at foreign policy? Mark these words iyan ang mababasa mo sa mga Google searches mo if and when China delivers on its pledges :lol: So ano ang gusto mo mangyari ngayon, awayin ang China? Singilin ang sinabi nilang ipapautang? Wahahaha ano gusto mo gayahin ka ng Pilipinas, demanding e mangungutang lang :lol: ikaw demanding ka pa e poser ka lang naman hihihihih

just to check your credibility, nag-ingay ka naman ba nung wala man lang solid, deterrent military response na ginawa ang US nung nag umpisang mang-usurp ang China sa WPS na yan? Alam mo ba ang official stand nila habang nangyayari yan, when we were desperate for military help from our “ally” the United States? Yung China na financial pledge, you’re quick to make a ruckus about their seeming nonfulfillment, and yet hindi pa naman halfway through ang term ni Duterte so still possible China will make good on a reasonable portion of their pledge....while the US being our ally, left us twisting in the wind at precisely the exact moment we needed their military might….hmmm financial pledge vs military response from an "ally", night and day ang contrast....kung nag iingay kang hinayupak ka ngayon tungkol sa financial pledge, aba e yung ally na hindi tumugon with a deterrent military response, even a symbolic one, should have merited more than pag-iingay sa yo, tama ba?

Let us see if you really call it as you see it or, if you are merely selective in which issues to criticize or make noise about…….in other words namumuntos lang

demanding na poser wrote:
after endless hours of Googling hindi ko pa din ma-gets ang isasagot ko hihihihih kaya, assert our WPS rights at demand the pledged financial assistance, ayos ba ang pagkakakontra ng stance na pinost ko, hindi naman siguro yan mahahalata ng China :lol: yung iba pang issues na ni-raise ng nakakaimbyernang PeluB na yan sa Q2, as usual no pansin ulit, I hope may "long and winding" ulit na post si himuderong huklubang poser at iba pang "fans" ni Pelu para mapagtakpan hihihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


apologist na ng US ngayon yun demanding na poser :shock: hihihihih pinagmamalaki pa ng ungas ang vacillation ng US wahahahaha bobo talaga

o eto basahin mong bobo ka baka maintindihan mo, but I doubt it hihihih

para sa bobong demanding na poser hihihihih wrote:
It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.





yung question about your credibility, bakit dedma ka pa din hanggang ngayon? nagu-google ka pa din ba at wala pa din mahanap to save your face and ego? :shock:



Quote:
sino ka ba para magdictate na ang schedule mo ang masusunod, ang issues na handpicked mo lang ang "dapat" discuss? at kung kelan mo gusto sagutin saka mo sasagutin?


demanding na poser ka talaga ha hindi yan pasado bistado ka na kaya harapin mo ang kahihiyan mo hihihihihih :lol:



and so........



:celebrate:

[/quote]
Wala na sa hulog ang rebuttal, puro long and winding posts na leading to nowhere.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:01 am 
ikaw magmula kailan ka pa uto-uto ng US? mula ng pinanganak ka, so mga 70+ years ago ba? wahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:03 am 
me pa-long and winding posts pa tong poser na to



e hindi nga marunong mag-quote, bobo talaga poser lang kasi wahahahahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:





hindi pa marunong magbasa, panay iwas kasi palpak na naman ang binitawang linya tungkol sa "stance" daw ng US sa WPS hihihihihih palusot na naman dedma as usual, kaso bistado na kawawa :bounce1:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:03 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6369
PeluBoy wrote:
ikaw magmula kailan ka pa uto-uto ng US? mula ng pinanganak ka, so mga 70+ years ago ba? wahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:


Paanong nauto, di ba the US military bases were kicked out by the Senate


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:04 am 
Offline
Heavyweight

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:03 pm
Posts: 6369
PeluBoy wrote:
me pa-long and winding posts pa tong poser na to



e hindi nga marunong mag-quote, bobo talaga poser lang kasi wahahahahahahaha :lol: :lol: :lol:





hindi pa marunong magbasa, panay iwas kasi palpak na naman ang binitawang linya tungkol sa "stance" daw ng US sa WPS hihihihihih palusot na naman dedma as usual, kaso bistado na kawawa :bounce1:


Ad hominem na, o kung palpak bakit hindi mo iquote yong actual US stand which I posted, and then make a relevant rebuttal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 11:06 am 
up para sa gustong magpalusot sa kabobohan niya hihihihih :lol:
para sa bobong demanding na poser hihihihih wrote:
It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.



.....so yung tanong tungkol sa credibility mo, ano na? nag-ingay ka ba nuon? poser poser tsk tsk :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52992 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3294, 3295, 3296, 3297, 3298, 3299, 3300 ... 3533  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group