Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

I am ambivalent on the matter - but the fact remains that the SC ruled on this during the time of Pnoy http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nat ... ers/story/

nagmamagaling yung poser tungkol sa pledge ng China, demanding talaga ang pulpol ano naman kaya ang iiiyak mo kung napautang na ang gobyerno ng malaking percent ng pledges ng China? Magiging heavily indebted tayo na baka ma-compromise ang political independence at foreign policy? Mark these words iyan ang mababasa mo sa mga Google searches mo if and when China delivers on its pledges So ano ang gusto mo mangyari ngayon, awayin ang China? Singilin ang sinabi nilang ipapautang? Wahahaha ano gusto mo gayahin ka ng Pilipinas, demanding e mangungutang lang ikaw demanding ka pa e poser ka lang naman hihihihih

just to check your credibility, nag-ingay ka naman ba nung wala man lang solid, deterrent military response na ginawa ang US nung nag umpisang mang-usurp ang China sa WPS na yan? Alam mo ba ang official stand nila habang nangyayari yan, when we were desperate for military help from our “ally” the United States? Yung China na financial pledge, you’re quick to make a ruckus about their seeming nonfulfillment, and yet hindi pa naman halfway through ang term ni Duterte so still possible China will make good on a reasonable portion of their pledge....while the US being our ally, left us twisting in the wind at precisely the exact moment we needed their military might….hmmm financial pledge vs military response from an "ally", night and day ang contrast....kung nag iingay kang hinayupak ka ngayon tungkol sa financial pledge, aba e yung ally na hindi tumugon with a deterrent military response, even a symbolic one, should have merited more than pag-iingay sa yo, tama ba?

Let us see if you really call it as you see it or, if you are merely selective in which issues to criticize or make noise about…….in other words namumuntos lang

me nalalaman pa tong “And for this pittance - we have practically ceded our rights to the WPS” biling bili mo ang storyline na ginawa ng mga me vested interests diyan sa WPS and not merely by coincidence had more to gain had Roxas won the 2016 polls….alam mo ba yan? Dalawa lang ang possibility, alam mo nga and you just chose to ignore it in your dumb post, or worse, bobo ka talagang bozo ka

what happens daw if the sh!t hits the fan? bakit, diyan ba sa pag ngawa-ngawa mo mag-iimprove ang inflation? …………nag-iilusyon ka ba na sa pag-cite mo ng articles, kesyo ang current account deficit is this and that, it will make a difference in the economy, na ikaw ang magsasalba ng kung ano man ang pinapangarap mong salbahin? ano ba yang ginagawa mo sa tingin mo? na isa kang armchair economist ? bwesit na to talagang poser na poser lang wahahahahaa

pangarap ko kasing maging wheelchair economist poser nga kasi ako diba, na nag-iilusyon me nakikinig sakin na mga tutoong economists at binabasa ang mga pinost kong economic articles haaay hirap na hirap ako sa pag-intindi at pagpost niyan tsk, baka kasi hindi pa nila alam yan maski tutoong economista sila e mabuti na i-remind sila hihihihih yung mga hindi ko kapanalig mga lapdogs lang kayo kasi dapat wag kayo sumuporta sa admin ni Katay Digong dahil basta, look at the articles di ba hihih solid Santa Cory at Panot lang woohoo! yung hindi matangay wala kayo mga blind fanatics lang kayo hihihihihih

Here comes the trolls.

capitalize capitalize Beatles Beatles kailangan kong ipagtanggol si idol huhuhuhu aylabyu man!

sinagot ko na yan a, gusto mo i-up ko ulit ....... cinompute mo ba ang pinapacompute ko sa yong poser ka?

As usual wala na sa hulog ang mga response, tinanong mo ang US stand sa WPS , sinagot ng maayos, walang rebuttal, pilit idinidivert ang issue sa Hacienda Luisita which is not relevant to the present economy, or the WPS situation which are the most pressing issues at present

Tsk tsk , total eclipse of the mind

It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.

[

As usual wala na sa hulog ang mga response, tinanong mo ang US stand sa WPS , sinagot ng maayos, walang rebuttal, pilit idinidivert ang issue sa Hacienda Luisita which is not relevant to the present economy, or the WPS situation which are the most pressing issues at present

Tsk tsk , total eclipse of the mind

It [US] has rebuilt traditional alliances with the Philippines, continued the increasingly close relationship with Vietnam, built a de facto alliance with Singapore, and even wooed Cambodia and Myanmar, countries long alienated from the United States.

In the longer run, however, simply shifting the United States’ focus to Asia and staking out a clear position favoring international negotiation over the disputed South China Sea claims may not mollify other Asian nations and sufficiently push back against China. Right now, Vietnam, Singapore, and others are unwilling to make a clear choice between the United States and China, which is becoming the center of Asian economic integration.

But if not bu!lding a Cold War-style alliance structure, the United States will have to make clear not only to treaty allies like the Philippines but also partners like Vietnam, Singap0re, Indonesia, and Malaysia that--while hoping for a written mult!lateral code of conduct for the South China Sea dispute--the United States will bolster its presence in and around the South China Sea. This would include transferring naval assets from the Atlantic to the Pacific, h0lding regular exercises with partners near the S0uth China Sea, and building up basing c@pacity in Asian partners like Australia and Singapore. It also means encouraging the ASEAN nations and India to improve their naval-naval communications with China so as to avoid any deadly mistakes in the S0uth China Sea.

sino ka ba para magdictate na ang schedule mo ang masusunod, ang issues na handpicked mo lang ang "dapat" discuss? at kung kelan mo gusto sagutin saka mo sasagutin?


demanding na poser ka talaga ha hindi yan pasado bistado ka na kaya harapin mo ang kahihiyan mo hihihihihih



and so........