Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:20 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861 ... 884  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 9:41 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:06 am
Posts: 26978
Location: neverland
IceColdBeer wrote:
Ano daw mas malala? Yung imbecile o retarded? :lol: :lol: :lol:



Yung imbetarded :lol:

_________________
why suffer to buy expensive stuffs when the best things in life are done naked?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:21 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
pobreng retarded wrote:
Pelu, bumaliktad ka lang naman na walang problema ang Constitution ni Cory kasi I called your attention to check on the RA 9522 arguments sa SC. gusto mo pa nga akong ipahiya kung saan inenumerate mo kung ano ang RA 9522 at ano kinalaman nito sa Sabah issue. Proof ito na wala kang alam sa kaso. nung sinabihan kita hanapin ang kaso laban sa RA 9522, duon ka lang bumaligtad at sabi kesyo SC "deserves patriotic praise". eh hindi mo nga alam ang kaso na ito kung hindi pa kita sinabihan.

kaya nga sabi ko sa iyo, kung walang makita ang SC during their decision on the RA 9522, sa Constitution tulad na pinipilit mo BEFORE mo nalaman ang kaso tungkol sa RA 9522, ba't bumaliktad ka ngayon na sabihin mo ok na Constitution?

hindi mo pwedeng OK na ngayon Constitution ngayon before mo nalaman ang kaso ng RA 9522, dakdak ka ng dakdak na mali ang Constitution on Sabah. kasi wala namang nabago sa Constitution before and after mo nalaman ang RA 9522 na kaso.

kaya ka nga napahiya tapos parang batang musmos, nagkakalat ka ng mahahabang posts dito, paulit ulit, spamming na yan. wala namang bagong argumento kasi umamin ka na nga na walang problema ang Constitution nung sinabi mo na ang SC "deserves patriotic praise".

labag sa Forum rules yang spamming mo, kumakain pa ng space yan, dagdag gastos pa ke boss Shiva in matinaining this site, which is free.

umamin ka na lang na nagkamali ka, tao nga lang naman kasi. at of course kasi ikaw ay... amateur.

:lol:

hihihihihih bakit ba pinipilit mo lagyan ng sarili mong words ang posts ko :lol:


kailan ko sinabi na ok na ang 1987 Constitution?



kaya nga panay ang repost ko para wala ka ng kawala, e sa sobrang kapal mo, nakabalandra na sa yo ang posts ko yet you still claim pabago bago, paulit ulit,, pabago bago na naman, "ok na ang Constitution" hihihihih

akala kasi nakapuntos sa RA 9522 kaya kung maipagmalaki ganun ganun na lang wahahahaha :bounce1:


hindi mo na ba kaya tumayo sa issues kaya kung anuanong bandwidth issues na ang hinihila mo ak ak ak :biglaugh:


I will repost once again, what I have been saying all along
Lord Pelu wrote:
the SC decision made in 2011, interpreted favorably for the country on the ambiguity created by Santa Cory's blatant attempt to renounce the claim.....does this erase Santa Cory and her henchmen's attempts to finally abandon the Sabah claim? .....the SC deserves patriotic praise for its interpretation of the wordings of the 1987 Constitution with its notorious "omission" admitted by Bernas himself :shock:, certainly.....but to absolve Santa Santita because of this SC decision? hihihihihih you must be a Dilawang uto-uto ak ak ak :biglaugh:





hihihihihihih of course, baka na naman sabihin mo ngayon ko lang yan pinost........so





"reposting"

----------------



basahin mo nga ulit ito :shock:

this time bagalan mo ng maigi para may comprehension naman ha hihihih :lol:

wala bang ambiguity sa 1987 Constitution, na sinadya ni Santa Cory at mga kabig niya :lol:

supalpalin mo nga si Fr. Joaquin Bernas na yan, tila Loyalista din yata e buong akala natin lahat Coryista yang tulad mong retarded ka e wahahahahahaha :lol:

PeluBoy wrote:
bakit nga ba ito tinanggal ni Santa Cory at kanyang mga "handpicked constitutionalists" sa 1987 Constitution? :shock:

1973 Constitution wrote:
“all other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title”


hindi sila masyado guilty, nagpaliwanag pa nga si Bernas ng excuse para ke Santa Santita o

huhuhuhuh wrote:
Be that as it may, eminent constitutionalist, Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J., expresses the view that “The validity of our territorial claims does not rest on constitutional sanction but on our historic rights……” but counsels, “…….on the other hand, would a constitutional definition of territory have the effect of legitimizing a territorial claim not founded on some legal right protected by international law ?”


hihihihih :lol: :lol: :lol:


kasi nga me balak na ang Santa, and with the help of her allies in Congress.....


Image

nalaman mo na ba kung sino nagsulat niyan hihihihihihih
:bounce1:



the SC decision made in 2011, interpreted favorably for the country on the ambiguity created by Santa Cory's blatant attempt to renounce the claim.....does this erase Santa Cory and her henchmen's attempts to finally abandon the Sabah claim? .....the SC deserves patriotic praise for its interpretation of the wordings of the 1987 Constitution with its notorious "omission" admitted by Bernas himself :shock:, certainly.....but to absolve Santa Santita because of this SC decision? hihihihihih you must be a Dilawang uto-uto ak ak ak :biglaugh:





bakit ba kailangan pa kasi na magkaron ng ambiguity sa 1987 Constitution about this, why didn't the Con-Com just adopt the phrasing of the 1973 Constitution's territorial declaration na may “all other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title”...kasi nga may November 1987


incindentally sino ba ang Chief Justice noon, good job Chief for the unanimous vote, CJ Crown! :lol: nautusan pa si Carping magsulat wahahahahahaha :lol:



:bounce1:

hihihih kawawa na naman

:lol: :lol: :lol:


akala natupad na ang matagal tagal na din pinapangarap hihihihihihih


hindi pa din pala nakabawi :lol: :lol: :lol:



I can repost this hanggat hindi mo naco-comprehend, we all have to make allowances for retards hihihih

:bounce1:

Image

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:22 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
:celebrate:

:bounce1:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:24 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
Romy Nabas wrote:
IceColdBeer wrote:
Ano daw mas malala? Yung imbecile o retarded? :lol: :lol: :lol:



Yung imbetarded :lol:

wahahahahaha kawawa talaga ang "pobreng imbetarded" :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 3:51 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:47 pm
Posts: 24845
:lol:

parang kausap ko lang si mang gorio, pag nakakita ng 'christian' eh nag wawala at post ng post ng mga spam quotations or posts. pikunin kasi. :lol:

kung mali pa rin sa tingin mo ang 1987 Constitution, eh ano yung sinasabi ng SC sa decision nila on RA 9522's constitutionality wherein it says there is no law that abandoned the claim on Sabah, confirming that RA 5446 is still a valid law. kaya pa ulit ulit kong sinasabi, kung ang 1987 Constitution ay nagsasabi na nag give up na ng claim ang Sabah kasi nga dahil sa sinasabi mong 'ambiguity' ek ek mo, eh bakit sabi ng SC, and I quote:

Quote:
Statutory Claim Over Sabah under RA 5446 Retained

Petitioners argument for the invalidity of RA 9522 for its failure to textualize the Philippines claim over Sabah in North Borneo is also untenable. Section 2 of RA 5446, which RA 9522 did not repeal, keeps open the door for drawing the baselines of Sabah:

Section 2. The definition of the baselines of the territorial sea of the Philippine Archipelago as provided in this Act is without prejudice to the delineation of the baselines of the territorial sea around the territory of Sabah, situated in North Borneo, over which the Republic of the Philippines has acquired dominion and sovereignty. (Emphasis supplied)


kita mo gamit na mga words: retained, acquired dominion, sovereignty.

eh Republic Act lang yan. kung valid yang "ambiguity claim" mo, dapat sinabi na ng SC na tama ang mga naghain ng complaint against RA 9552, na inabandon na nga ang claim on Sabah conforming to the Constitution. kasi nga mas mataas ang Constitution over any law, including Republic Acts.

the mere fact na VALID ang dalawang RAs, 9552 and 5446, mean nag co conform ito sa Constitution na still nag ke claim ng Sabah as part of our sovereignty.

I mean, do I have to explain these things, napaka elementary naman ng english dyan, sus kahit mga nasa kindergarten kaya mag interpret nyan.

well, unless you are a kindergarten amaeteur.

:lol:

_________________
"I will make you an offer you can't refuse." - Michael Corleone


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:19 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:31 pm
Posts: 4675
Location: City of Angels, Pamp
Romy Nabas wrote:
IceColdBeer wrote:
Ano daw mas malala? Yung imbecile o retarded? :lol: :lol: :lol:



Yung imbetarded :lol:


Pare-parehas lang na retarded yan. Nagkaiba lang sa level (IQ) ng subject. Swerte nga yung mga BOBO sa Math na pang 8 - 12 yo at Mor0n pa lang ang tawag. :mrgreen:

_________________
I defend PAC on OSDT and Catchweight Issues; Not his Traditional Politics and Religious Exploits.

"Marcos, Hitler, Diktador, TUTA. Patalsikin ang bangkay ni Marcos sa LNMB". PATALSIKIN!!!
____


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 5:22 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:31 pm
Posts: 4675
Location: City of Angels, Pamp
don robert wrote:
:lol:

parang kausap ko lang si mang gorio, pag nakakita ng 'christian' eh nag wawala at post ng post ng mga spam quotations or posts. pikunin kasi. :lol:

kung mali pa rin sa tingin mo ang 1987 Constitution, eh ano yung sinasabi ng SC sa decision nila on RA 9522's constitutionality wherein it says there is no law that abandoned the claim on Sabah, confirming that RA 5446 is still a valid law. kaya pa ulit ulit kong sinasabi, kung ang 1987 Constitution ay nagsasabi na nag give up na ng claim ang Sabah kasi nga dahil sa sinasabi mong 'ambiguity' ek ek mo, eh bakit sabi ng SC, and I quote:

Quote:
Statutory Claim Over Sabah under RA 5446 Retained

Petitioners argument for the invalidity of RA 9522 for its failure to textualize the Philippines claim over Sabah in North Borneo is also untenable. Section 2 of RA 5446, which RA 9522 did not repeal, keeps open the door for drawing the baselines of Sabah:

Section 2. The definition of the baselines of the territorial sea of the Philippine Archipelago as provided in this Act is without prejudice to the delineation of the baselines of the territorial sea around the territory of Sabah, situated in North Borneo, over which the Republic of the Philippines has acquired dominion and sovereignty. (Emphasis supplied)


kita mo gamit na mga words: retained, acquired dominion, sovereignty.

eh Republic Act lang yan. kung valid yang "ambiguity claim" mo, dapat sinabi na ng SC na tama ang mga naghain ng complaint against RA 9552, na inabandon na nga ang claim on Sabah conforming to the Constitution. kasi nga mas mataas ang Constitution over any law, including Republic Acts.

the mere fact na VALID ang dalawang RAs, 9552 and 5446, mean nag co conform ito sa Constitution na still nag ke claim ng Sabah as part of our sovereignty.

I mean, do I have to explain these things, napaka elementary naman ng english dyan, sus kahit mga nasa kindergarten kaya mag interpret nyan.

well, unless you are a kindergarten amaeteur.

:lol:


Ka level na yan ng 3 -7 yo. ID!OT na ang tawag diyan. :mrgreen:

_________________
I defend PAC on OSDT and Catchweight Issues; Not his Traditional Politics and Religious Exploits.

"Marcos, Hitler, Diktador, TUTA. Patalsikin ang bangkay ni Marcos sa LNMB". PATALSIKIN!!!
____


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:38 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:22 am
Posts: 18248
ang mga walang kasusta-sustansyang mga argumento...... ulit-ulitin man ay walang sustansya pa rin.




:lol: :lol:

_________________
"at least 2 years pa lang kaming nauuto ng tatay digong namin"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:57 pm 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:06 am
Posts: 26978
Location: neverland
Ano na tayo?

Magpapasko na naman, di pa rin nagrerecount :lol:

_________________
why suffer to buy expensive stuffs when the best things in life are done naked?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:19 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
pobreng retarded wrote:
:lol:

parang kausap ko lang si mang gorio, pag nakakita ng 'christian' eh nag wawala at post ng post ng mga spam quotations or posts. pikunin kasi. :lol:

kung mali pa rin sa tingin mo ang 1987 Constitution, eh ano yung sinasabi ng SC sa decision nila on RA 9522's constitutionality wherein it says there is no law that abandoned the claim on Sabah, confirming that RA 5446 is still a valid law. kaya pa ulit ulit kong sinasabi, kung ang 1987 Constitution ay nagsasabi na nag give up na ng claim ang Sabah kasi nga dahil sa sinasabi mong 'ambiguity' ek ek mo, eh bakit sabi ng SC, and I quote:

Quote:
Statutory Claim Over Sabah under RA 5446 Retained

Petitioners argument for the invalidity of RA 9522 for its failure to textualize the Philippines claim over Sabah in North Borneo is also untenable. Section 2 of RA 5446, which RA 9522 did not repeal, keeps open the door for drawing the baselines of Sabah:

Section 2. The definition of the baselines of the territorial sea of the Philippine Archipelago as provided in this Act is without prejudice to the delineation of the baselines of the territorial sea around the territory of Sabah, situated in North Borneo, over which the Republic of the Philippines has acquired dominion and sovereignty. (Emphasis supplied)


kita mo gamit na mga words: retained, acquired dominion, sovereignty.

eh Republic Act lang yan. kung valid yang "ambiguity claim" mo, dapat sinabi na ng SC na tama ang mga naghain ng complaint against RA 9552, na inabandon na nga ang claim on Sabah conforming to the Constitution. kasi nga mas mataas ang Constitution over any law, including Republic Acts.

the mere fact na VALID ang dalawang RAs, 9552 and 5446, mean nag co conform ito sa Constitution na still nag ke claim ng Sabah as part of our sovereignty.

I mean, do I have to explain these things, napaka elementary naman ng english dyan, sus kahit mga nasa kindergarten kaya mag interpret nyan.

well, unless you are a kindergarten amaeteur.

:lol:

wahahahahahaha mali mali pa ang isfeling ng self-proclaimed professional retarded :lol:


hindi marunong magbilang

hindi marunong magbasa

hindi rin marunong sa isfeling hihihihih.......Bingo!!!



bakit kaya ang lahat ng sinabi niya, e nasagot na ng mga sinabi ko? :shock:

is it any wonder then, why this retard has been desperately trying to prevent me from reposting my posts? :bounce1:

again, let us see what I have been saying all along hihihih...
Lord Pelu wrote:
the SC decision made in 2011, interpreted favorably for the country on the ambiguity created by Santa Cory's blatant attempt to renounce the claim.....does this erase Santa Cory and her henchmen's attempts to finally abandon the Sabah claim? .....the SC deserves patriotic praise for its interpretation of the wordings of the 1987 Constitution with its notorious "omission" admitted by Bernas himself :shock:, certainly.....but to absolve Santa Santita because of this SC decision? hihihihihih you must be a Dilawang uto-uto ak ak ak :biglaugh:



meron nga bang "ambiguity" sa 1987 Constitution, o baka naman wala according to the resident Pacland retard hmm?

saan ba yan nag-umpisa kasi? hihihihih


Quote:
It came to light that as our Sabah claim gained international prominence during the early 1960s we were asked, “If Sabah is really yours, why is it that it does not even appear in the records of the 1935 Philippine Constitution?”


and so
1973 Constitution wrote:
“all other territories belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title”


but this happened
Image

so
1987 Constitution wrote:
deleted
:shock:


to justify the ambiguity they themselves created in the 1987 Constitution
Image
Image
Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J. wrote:
“The validity of our territorial claims does not rest on constitutional sanction but on our historic rights……” “…….on the other hand, would a constitutional definition of territory have the effect of legitimizing a territorial claim not founded on some legal right protected by international law ?"


ayan naman pala, yung mismong Consitutional Commission member, the renowned constitutionalist and shall we say, Coryista-extraordinaire, Fr. Joaquin Bernas S.J, explained their notorious "omission" that created such "ambiguity" in the 1987 Constitution hihihihih....eh ano pala yung sinasabi nung mismong gumawa ng text ng Constitution na yan, imahinasyon lang niya? wahahahaha.......and when was this perpetrated, this omission? 1987 :bounce1:

fast-forward to 2011, at ang mga uto-utong Dilawan, as expected now wants to erase this dastardly act :lol: hihihih by riding on the Supreme Court's patriotic interpretation of the existing ambiguity in the Cory Constitution..........lumang style na yan tsk :bounce1:

ang kagandahan ng isang sound and true argument, kahit ano pa ang ikontra, it can stand on its own, ang sarap ulit ulitin hihihihihihih

Lord Pelu wrote:
the SC decision made in 2011, interpreted favorably for the country on the ambiguity created by Santa Cory's blatant attempt to renounce the claim.....does this erase Santa Cory and her henchmen's attempts to finally abandon the Sabah claim? .....the SC deserves patriotic praise for its interpretation of the wordings of the 1987 Constitution with its notorious "omission" admitted by Bernas himself :shock:, certainly.....but to absolve Santa Santita because of this SC decision? hihihihihih you must be a Dilawang uto-uto ak ak ak :biglaugh:



:celebrate:
:bounce1:

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:21 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
dan44 wrote:
Image


ito pala ang matagal nang crush ni Renkot at paborito niya ..nahalata tuloy ang pag ka dingba ni poser :lol:


Go sock it to 'em, Dan

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:23 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
at siyempre............


Go DDS!

Duwendeng Dyutay Shorty!


Image
:bounce1:
Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:25 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:46 pm
Posts: 6104
Location: Mithrandir
apekted na apekted ang mga uto-utong Dilawan wahahahahahaha




masakit talaga tanggapin na 32 years na ang utuang nagaganap

:celebrate:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Mines of Moria


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:58 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:22 am
Posts: 18248
nagkalat na naman ng sabaw na wala namang kasusta-sustansya.


kahit saan, kahit kailan, kahit anong isyu ang pinag-uusapan.


lampaso palagi ng kanyang mga kahuntahan.



kawawa........:biglaugh: :biglaugh:

_________________
"at least 2 years pa lang kaming nauuto ng tatay digong namin"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BBM for president
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:15 am 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:56 pm
Posts: 2490
:cry: :whistle:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 855, 856, 857, 858, 859, 860, 861 ... 884  Next

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: platinum and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group