andycastro wrote:
Pacquiao being able to carry his speed and power to the higher weights without Ariza is highly speculative and not probable.
Really? And what do u call these statements of yours...
andycastro wrote:
Supplements (tangible) cannot be substituted with discipline (intangible). A boxer needs both. And two articles about the fighters you mentioned tell different stories. Both have been suspected of PEDs usage.
andycastro wrote:
The sweet science has evolved from a sport where coaches have minimal intervention to a more complicated science where body conditioning is a must to survive the competition. Too many weight divisions and weigh ins a day before the actual fight heavily contributed to this state of boxing. From sweet science to the science of supplements.
Statement of facts or highly speculative in nature?
Then, present to us by definition and example supplements are just as important as discipline?
What did the science of supplements did to the career of Mosley, Vargas, Toney and Morales?
If im not mistaken, they lost their fights after being caught with banned substances inside their system.
Did the highly scientific S & C aide that Dela Hoya go through before the pacquiao fight enhance his physical form and performance?
Or the velocity training that Morales went through before the Pacquiao rubbermatch?
Tell me something new, tol.
