Pacland's Philippine Boxing Forum

Discussion on boxing and other sports, Filipino greats and anything under the sun.
It is currently Wed Jun 20, 2018 11:39 pm

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:28 am 
Offline
Heavyweight
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:35 pm
Posts: 4840
Erap wrote:
namme wrote:
KOArtist9 wrote:
think his share (if any) would come from PPV revenue, not gate ticket revenue.

Ok, that would also mean that if the PPV revenue is not that high, that would mean PacMan will mostly rely on that $3M (was it $3M?) that he got for fighting Diaz?


Yep, minus U.S. and R.P. taxes, trainer fees, other trainer fees, other amuyong fees, entourage accomodations etc.


chavit's 'balato' to manny is tax-free..and it's also worth millions..

_________________
Iesous Christos Theou hUios Soter.

" I search history in vain to find the equal to Jesus Christ. " - Napoleon Bonaparte

" In the beginning, God made the heavens and the earth... now everything else is Made in China. "


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:37 pm 
Offline
Featherweight
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:01 pm
Posts: 99
Location: East Midlands, England
namme wrote:
sbc_leics619 wrote:

Sorry mate: herewith are the rationale why I considered your question irrelevant:

you propounded a subjective question and yet it requires an objective answer.

upon perusal, the issue being raised is dependent on probables, hence
just mere pecuniary estimations no less.

As I opined in my earlier post, ONLY parties to the contract as well as from the people working in the Inland Revenue Services have a much better "grasp/answer" to the question at bar...! we have no way of ascertaining it...!

Again, my apologies for looking it that way...! No offense meant...!


PEACE....! :lol:



Well, you're right, but for me "pecuniary probables" are enough for me to think of, as responses...

Anyway, that's why I rephrased my question in my second post, "did Manny have a share in the gross ticket revenue?" again, even if it requires answers that are probable, at least I would know what others think of it. :)

Thanks for responding to my question!



CHEERS MATE...!

Indeed, you're correct as well..!

(That's the beauty of this forum which make it worthwhile, interesting & lively...! even though posters may tend or agree or disagree in certain issues, what matters most is the retention of respect & reverence amongst them thereby making the exchanges of views & ideas a little bit more pleasant)...!

:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:56 pm 
Offline
Cruiserweight
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:40 pm
Posts: 2077
sbc_leics619 wrote:
namme wrote:
sbc_leics619 wrote:

Sorry mate: herewith are the rationale why I considered your question irrelevant:

you propounded a subjective question and yet it requires an objective answer.

upon perusal, the issue being raised is dependent on probables, hence
just mere pecuniary estimations no less.

As I opined in my earlier post, ONLY parties to the contract as well as from the people working in the Inland Revenue Services have a much better "grasp/answer" to the question at bar...! we have no way of ascertaining it...!

Again, my apologies for looking it that way...! No offense meant...!


RPEACE....! :lol:



Well, you're right, but for me "pecuniary probables" are enough for me to think of, as responses...

Anyway, that's why I rephrased my question in my second post, "did Manny have a share in the gross ticket revenue?" again, even if it requires answers that are probable, at least I would know what others think of it. :)

Thanks for responding to my question!



CHEERS MATE...!

Indeed, you're correct as well..!

(That's the beauty of this forum which make it worthwhile, interesting & lively...! even though posters may tend or agree or disagree in certain issues, what matters most is the retention of respect & reverence amongst them thereby making the exchanges of views & ideas a little bit more pleasant)...!

:lol: :lol:


This is what I call "intelligent" post. Reading such comments makes this site much better. A good sample to show that we can argue with one another and still show sign of respect. This is how we should debate in this forum. 8) 8)

Anyways, back to the topic. I'm curious also how much MP receive after all those deductibles and payments to his team. Though I'm sure he gets a lot of money back during tax season :D :D

_________________
Fighting in the internet is like playing in the special olympics; Even if you win your still a RETARD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:08 pm 
Offline
Welterweight
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:06 pm
Posts: 328
More money that I could make in my lifetime... Unless I hit it big soon... :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

philboxing.com | pinoygreats.com
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group